Supporting cast: how one Trust helped disadvantaged students through lockdown

Students from disadvantaged backgrounds have had to overcome particular obstacles in lockdown – not least digital deprivation and the lack of access to interventions they would have had in school. Alan Dunne explains how the Laidlaw Schools Trust has strived to support them – and how their efforts have paid off

Highlights

  • Laidlaw Schools Trust consists of seven academies in the North East. Two of its three secondaries in the North East serve some of the poorest communities in the country, while the third, Sedgefield Community College, is in a relatively affluent area.
  • The Trust believes this diversity gives it strength – allowing its schools to cross-pollinate best practice and learn from one another, as demonstrated by its Trust-wide approach to literacy.
  • The New Group Reading Test has helped identify trends across their schools – both providing reassurance that their literacy strategy is working and enabling them to implement a targeted intervention programme for students who need extra support.

Alan Dunne Alan Dunne, Senior Strategic Lead for English, Laidlaw Schools Trust

We invested early on in an e-reading system, so students could access books on tablets and phones for free

The seven academies in the Laidlaw Schools Trust are typical of the varied patchwork that is school provision in Britain. Two of its three secondaries in the North East serve some of the poorest communities in the country, while the third, Sedgefield Community College, is in a less deprived area. Most of its secondary student cohort is white, with the exception of Excelsior Academy in Newcastle, which has a significant EAL intake. Far from being an impediment, the Trust believes this diversity gives it strength – allowing its schools to cross-pollinate best practice and learn from one another.

Alan Dunne, the Senior Strategic Lead for English for the secondary schools in the Trust, says as lockdown continued and the disruption to learning persisted, he feared students, particularly those from challenging backgrounds, would suffer badly. “When we returned in September last year, we had various catch-up plans. But from an English perspective it wasn’t obvious that a lot of school had been missed.

“We had to revisit some content, but most students had retained their skills. Our Year 11s could still write an essay and our Year 10s could write a piece of narrative writing to a standard that we would expect. The bit that was missing was progress between March and September – it wasn’t perhaps at the level we would want, but I don’t think there was much in the way of regression.”

It wasn’t all smooth sailing, though, he says. At first, during the initial lockdown, they struggled to engage students. “Only after Easter last year did we start to get into the swing of virtual lessons. And it’s only been in the last lockdown that we have really upped our offer with even more regular live input. But it took some time to bed in online learning – for the staff as well as the students.”

Does he think reading suffered less because it’s relatively easy for families to support compared to maths and science? “Yes, but we put a lot out there too – we invested early on in an e-reading system, so students could access books on tablets and phones for free.” The schools worked hard to minimise digital deprivation, Alan says. “The Laidlaw Foundation, which is our sponsor, donated enough money to enable us to buy devices for all students that needed one.”

NGRT helped pinpoint reading gaps

The Trust first started using the New Group Reading Test (NGRT) at Excelsior in 2019 because it realised there was a significant problem with reading. “We did a full round of NGRT with every year group and discovered that only a third of the cohort were reading at their chronological age.” When the school assessed students the following year, just before lockdown, it found they had made substantial progress, the proportion reading at their chronological age had increased to over 40%.

Alan says that on the back of the initial NGRT assessment, Excelsior had put in place various reading interventions. “We developed a very detailed literacy strategy based on Education Endowment Foundation recommendations that was embedded throughout the curriculum – a tiered reading system with appropriately pitched texts, which we have developed even more this year.”

When students were assessed after the first lockdown, in September of last year, the Trust was pleased to discover that overall scores hadn’t dropped – approximately 70% of the students at Sedgefield and just under half at Academy 360 had met their expected reading ages. “The gains we had made the previous year had been retained – but we were roughly in the same place in September as we were in March. The children had maintained their chronological reading ages but hadn’t improved upon them. I would have expected to see some gain if we had been in school, and I attribute the fact that we didn’t see progress entirely to lockdown.”

We did a full round of NGRT with every year group and discovered that only a third of the cohort were reading at their chronological age

We put our weakest readers on personalised phonics provision in school. But that’s been nigh on impossible to provide in lockdown

Performance of FSM students

The Trust also hasn’t seen the gap between FSM and non-FSM students worsen – in fact 80% of the pupil premium students at Excelsior, which represent 59% of the entire student cohort, have met the standard for their reading ages that would be expected in non-Covid years. Alan suspects this is because the majority of students have had a fairly full diet of online learning and have engaged with it. But while broader learning support has been possible, teachers have found it difficult to offer personalised interventions remotely.

“We put our weakest readers on personalised phonics provision in school. But that’s been nigh on impossible to provide in lockdown,” says Alan. “It’s the same with reciprocal reading. We haven’t been able to offer the drilled-down, specialist personalised learning support that we would’ve liked to have offered.”

Overall, however, reading performance at the Trust’s two secondaries in deprived areas, Excelsior and Academy 360, has held up remarkably well. “There wasn’t any widening of the gap between FSM and non-FSM students in the same cohort between March and September of last year – it’s been more or less the same in terms of reading age. In fact, I think those Year 10 students were in a much better place when they started Year 11 in September because we had put so much work into building up their confidence in English language skills.”

Sharing best practice across the Trust

Alan says that one of the strengths of the Trust is that it has enabled individual schools to share best practice and learn from each other – in this case, the teaching model from Sedgefield and the reading intervention model from Excelsior.

“There’s quite a lot of cross-pollination. The elements of the teaching model that encompass reading have been taken from Sedgefield, which is an outstanding school with amazing results, and fed into the other schools – the way we teach vocabulary, the way we scaffold tasks for students, the way we’ve adopted reciprocal reading, for instance.

“Tiered reading interventions we initially trialled at Excelsior, where we had the biggest challenge. The NGRT assessments allowed us to implement a targeted intervention of individual students based on their reading score outcomes. We’ve now rolled it out to the rest of the Trust. As a result, we now have a formalised strategy that explains how we approach literacy at every possible level, from the teaching of vocabulary and spelling to marking policies, to oracy, to writing, to scaffolding, to reading for pleasure, to reading interventions – it has the lot.”

We now have a formalised strategy that explains how we approach literacy at every possible level

I like NGRT because it’s instant and can give a real insight into which students have managed to progress outside of school and which haven’t

Post-lockdown priorities

Alan says the Trust’s priorities for reading now children have returned from lockdown will build on its detailed literacy policy. “We’ve really invested in reciprocal reading as a cross-curricula reading tool. We try to break down the mechanics of reading to ensure that the experience students get in English lessons they also get in science and humanities lessons. We’ve taken the recommendations from the EFF and looked at how we can embed them in our teaching model. And we’re looking, too, at how we teach vocabulary. 

The different schools have different priorities, he says. “Excelsior is in a very good place in terms of ensuring students get extra support where they need it with reading ages, and Academy 360 has really developed that this year, too. Sedgefield starts from a much better place and is now also ensuring that the tiered intervention model piloted at Excelsior is in place.”

Now the schools are back, the intention is to get a full round of NGRT with every student to try to judge what the impact of lockdown has been. “The question now is are the issues apparent in September still issues and if they’re not, what else do we do differently. And if they are, do we implement the same model we had before or do we change it slightly?

Identifying reading gaps

In common with most other schools, Alan says teachers at Laidlaw are particularly keen to understand how much children have learnt during lockdown and what the gaps are in their knowledge. And in this task, he says, reading age is key.

“I like NGRT because it’s instant and can give a real insight into which students have managed to progress outside of school and which haven’t. It’s easy to see quickly a pattern of stagnation – students can hide a lot in their academic performance that they can’t hide in their reading age, and that you don’t get with other tools.”

Understanding what exactly the problem may be with an individual student’s reading ability is really important, he says, and there just aren’t that many tools apart from NGRT that will allow you to do that. “An accurate reading age gives you a lot of clues into various sides of a student’s academic performance – be that behaviour for learning, performance in Year 11, inability to move up a particular grade in geography.

“I know that some schools don’t test reading ages and I think they’re missing a trick. Because a student can do very well in an assessment that they have been prepared for, but assessing their reading age will allow teachers to see if there are any underlying literacy issues that may not be detected otherwise.”

An accurate reading age gives you a lot of clues into various sides of a student’s academic performance

Share Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

Find out more about our reading assessments

Ongoing assessment of your students’ reading allows you to identify any gaps they may have - and our New Group Reading Test® (NGRT) is an ideal starting point. NGRT is a standardised, termly assessment that reliably measures reading skills against the national average, and it can be used alongside other assessments to pinpoint where support is needed and demonstrate the impact of your interventions.

Find out more

Find out how we can support you

Vikki Dodd

We offer a broad range of training and support options, to help you get the most out of your assessments and build a complete picture of your students’ strengths and needs. We also have a dedicated Assessment Insights team to assist you in making the best use of your assessments. Vikki, our Secondary expert, is on hand to answer any questions from talking through what your data is showing you to which reports are most useful for your school’s needs.

Find out more